← All history sessions

Session 01 · 38-minute core

Ancient Babylonian Mathematics

A 38-minute investigation of how sexagesimal place value shaped calculation, using YBC 7289 to separate surviving evidence from modern explanation.

Driving question: How does a number system shape calculation?

Objectives

Prerequisites: Decimal place value, fractions and the Pythagorean theorem. No prior history of mathematics is required.

Section 1 of 9 · 38-minute core sequence

Section 1 · 3 min

Observe the tablet

YBC 7289 is an Old Babylonian clay tablet. Begin with what is visible: a square, two diagonals and grouped wedge marks. Do not name the numbers yet.

An artifact can support an observation before it supports an interpretation. The photograph records the surviving tablet; our normalized sign diagrams are teaching reconstructions.

Photograph of YBC 7289, obverse: a round clay tablet with an incised square, diagonals and grouped wedge impressions.
YBC 7289 · YPM BC 021354. Photograph: Urcia, A., Yale Peabody Museum; combined image: Theodor Langhorne Franklin. Source · CC0. Cropped to the obverse. View original photograph ↗

Section 2 · 6 min

Build a base-60 place-value system

A normalized teaching diagram uses one sign for 1 and another for 10. Repeated signs build the values within one place. The ancient impressions varied; the diagram is not a claim that every wedge had one identical shape.

Successive places have values …, 60², 60¹, 60⁰, 60⁻¹, 60⁻², …. In modern transcription, 1,3 means one group of sixty and three units: 1 × 60 + 3 = 63. The comma is modern punctuation.

Try reading 1,12 and 2,5, then encode 125. Since 125 = 2 × 60 + 5, its sexagesimal transcription is 2,5.

Reconstruction · base sixty

Read the places

× 601
× 600
Modern transcription2,1760 = 13710

2 × 60^1 + 17 × 60^0

Schematic signs, modern punctuation. “Empty” is an explanatory label, not an Old Babylonian zero sign. Changing the point changes our interpretation of scale.

Section 3 · 6 min

Fractions and reciprocals

Places can continue to the right of the units place. We write 0;30 = 30/60 = 1/2. The semicolon is a modern transcription convention, not a symbol pressed into the tablet.

Multiplying by 0;30 divides by 2 because 2 × 0;30 = 1. Reciprocal tables made many divisions into multiplications, a natural fit for a positional base-60 system.

Section 4 · 3 min

Calculate 37 ÷ 6

Use the reciprocal 1/6 = 0;10. Six groups of ten sixtieths make one whole.

Then 37 ÷ 6 = 37 × 0;10 = 6;10. In modern fraction notation, 6;10 = 6 + 10/60 = 6 + 1/6.

Section 5 · 8 min

Investigate YBC 7289

Work silently for three minutes before requesting a hint. Read A as four consecutive sexagesimal places and write an exact place-value sum. Then conjecture what A might describe.

Treat A and B as two undecoded inscriptions at first. The staged reveal preserves the distinction between decoding marks, finding a numerical relationship and interpreting what the numbers mean.

Detail of the obverse of YBC 7289: wedge impressions beside the incised diagonal.
YBC 7289 · YPM BC 021354. Photograph: Urcia, A., Yale Peabody Museum; combined image: Theodor Langhorne Franklin. Source · CC0. Enlarged obverse detail. View original photograph ↗

YBC 7289 inscriptions · schematic reconstruction

A
B
Read each group from left to right. Choose the scale and interpretation yourself. These normalized teaching signs are not a facsimile.

Section 6 · 3 min

A modern geometric bridge

For a modern unit square, the Pythagorean theorem gives d² = 1² + 1² = 2, so the positive diagonal length is d = √2.

This derivation explains why the decoded value is relevant to a square. It is our modern explanatory bridge. It does not claim that YBC 7289 contains Greek notation, this proof, or a recorded algorithm for producing the approximation.

Section 7 · 5 min

A smaller and a larger number

A problem associated with YBC 6967 asks for a smaller and a larger number. Their difference is 7, and at the scale used here their product is 1,0 — that is, 60 in decimal notation. A rectangular area story can help us picture the problem, but that setting is a modern classroom adaptation.

Try factor pairs first. Then compare your method with a translated procedure: halve the difference, square it, add the product, take the square root, then add and subtract the half-difference.

Section 8 · 3 min

Evidence and explanation

Artifact evidence includes the surviving layout and marks. Reading those marks as sexagesimal numbers is a scholarly interpretation expressed through modern transcription. The unit-square equation is a derivation. A proposed square-root algorithm is a reconstruction unless the procedure itself is documented.

Plimpton 322 can prompt an open question about the purpose of a mathematical table, but contested interpretations should remain questions rather than settled labels.

Section 9 · 1 min

Return to the question

Base 60 changes the size of each place and makes many useful fractions terminate. A reciprocal table turns division into multiplication. These are connected features of a calculation system, not isolated tricks.

Exit recall: state the place values in 1;24, explain one step in 37 ÷ 6, and label one statement from today as artifact evidence, derivation, numerical experiment, reconstruction or open question.

Enrichment

Choose at most one extension when time allows. Neither is required for the core objectives.

Numerical accuracy of YBC 7289

The tablet value is 1;24,51,10 = 30,547/21,600 ≈ 1.414212963, while a modern calculation gives √2 ≈ 1.414213562. The absolute error is about 5.994 × 10⁻⁷. This is a modern numerical experiment: closeness does not identify the undocumented method that produced the tablet value.

Square-root iteration reconstruction

Starting with x₀ = 3/2, the modern reconstruction xₙ₊₁ = (xₙ + 2/xₙ)/2 gives 17/12 and then 577/408. It demonstrates how an approximation can improve, but it is not a procedure written on YBC 7289.

Prepare for class

Open this on the teacher computer while connected. It stores and verifies the core same-origin pages, scripts, styles, fonts and images in this browser. Browser cache can be cleared by device policy, so also print the teacher fallback.

Nothing has been checked yet.

Sources & further reading

  1. University resource

    A 3,800-year journey from classroom to classroom

    Patrick Lynch · Yale University. 2016.

    Yale Babylonian Collection · YBC 7289

    Provenance and reuse

    Linked source; no third-party media reproduced. Original Atlas diagrams are labeled reconstructions. Consult the institution for reuse of its images.

    Accessed 2026-09-20.

  2. Collection record

    YBC 7289, obverse and reverse: collection photograph

    Urcia, A. · Yale Peabody Museum of Natural History; combined image by Theodor Langhorne Franklin. 2019.

    Yale Babylonian Collection · YPM BC 021354 / YBC 7289

    Provenance and reuse

    CC0 1.0 Universal Public Domain Dedication, as recorded on the file page. The original photograph is served locally. The observation view crops to the obverse; the investigation view enlarges a detail with CSS. No marks have been redrawn. The unmodified combined image remains available.

    Accessed 2026-09-23.

  3. University resource

    Analysis of YBC 7289

    Bill Casselman · University of British Columbia.

    Provenance and reuse

    Linked source; no third-party media reproduced. Original Atlas diagrams are labeled reconstructions. Consult the institution for reuse of its images.

    Accessed 2026-09-20.

  4. University resource

    Babylonian numerals

    J. J. O’Connor and E. F. Robertson · University of St Andrews. 2000.

    Provenance and reuse

    Linked source; no third-party media reproduced. Original Atlas diagrams are labeled reconstructions. Consult the institution for reuse of its images.

    Accessed 2026-09-20.

  5. Primary Source

    Algebra in Cuneiform: YBC 6967

    Jens Høyrup · Max Planck Research Library. 2017. Chapter 3: The Fundamental Techniques for the Second Degree; section YBC 6967.

    Yale Babylonian Collection · YBC 6967

    Provenance and reuse

    Linked source; no third-party media reproduced. Original Atlas diagrams are labeled reconstructions. Consult the institution for reuse of its images.

    Accessed 2026-09-20.

Diagrams and teaching explanations are original Atlas reconstructions unless otherwise identified. Source checking and automated tests do not imply a recorded human historical review.